Enterprise GTM AI

Revenue is being rebuilt under AI. We are how serious teams do it.

Your board mandated AI. But agents only reason as well as the model beneath them — and your revenue isn't a model yet. Epicbrief is the layer serious teams build on.

Customers

Business impact

Revenue leaders, on the record.

Three enterprise GTM orgs. Three numbers that moved once the intelligence layer was in place.

2060% YoY growth · 6 months

“Our YoY growth increased from 20 to 60% in 6 months because we were able to make GTM and product decisions based on objective data from Epicbrief.”

Amritpal Singh
Amritpal Singh President, Field Operations · Multiplier
98% Forecast accuracy · 2 quarters

“Creating more time for my reps to sell, removing friction in the sales process, delivering objectivity and consistency in the way in which we operate and report are all of critical importance for me.”

Mark Woodhams
Mark Woodhams Chief Revenue Officer · Neo4j
2.2× Enterprise win rate · 9 months

“We clearly see the sales execution and product gaps we need to fix to successfully transition from product-led / mid-market to enterprise sales motion.”

Martin Illman
Martin Illman Chief Revenue Officer · Supermetrics

01 · The problem

Revenue teams lose 3–12 months learning agents can't move the number alone.

3–6 months

Connect Claude to everything

Cost scales per query. Five reps, five answers about the same deal.

6–9 months

Build it on the warehouse

Six months of engineering. The warehouse isn't a model.

9–12 months

Buy AI-native revenue cockpit

Generic outputs. Reps don't adopt — they bin the tool.

AGENTS
Reps
Managers
Ops
Execs
The GTM intelligence layer.
GTM Ontology
GTM Graph
Integrations
DATA SOURCES

02 · The evidence

Speed never moved revenue. Decisions did.

Agents save time. They don't make the revenue engine smarter — and the context behind every good decision is still fragmented across every tool your team uses.

03 · In practice

Every CMO has an ICP slide. Almost nobody knows if it's true.

Marketing builds the ICP from firmographics, intent data, and the GTM team's best read — before deals close. The CRO suspects it isn't the real pattern. The CFO can't prove it. None of them can ask the question that would settle it. Until the layer exists.

"Show me the deals we closed in 2025 that closed in under 60 days at under 5% discount. What pattern do they share — champion role, EB seniority, dominant pain, criteria that mattered, committee shape? And where are we still marketing to companies that don't fit the pattern?"

The use case: the CMO presents an ICP slide every quarter. Most of those slides are targeting hypotheses, not patterns from what closed. The gap between the two is where misallocated GTM spend lives — for one to ten million per year at enterprise scale.

Marketing's ICP slide

The hypothesis

  • $50M+ ARR
  • Retail · Fintech · Healthcare
  • 1,000+ employees
  • North America
  • Tech stack: Snowflake, Salesforce

Built from firmographic data + intent + analyst reports. Before any deals closed. Updated quarterly in a deck.

What the layer answers

The pattern

  • EB is the CFO — regardless of industry
  • Top criterion: "reduces close-of-books time"
  • Source: CXO referral within 30 days
  • Committee adds IT lead by week 2
  • 47-day median cycle · 4% discount

Industry was the 8th strongest correlation. Marketing was targeting the wrong dimensions — and spending against them.

WHY THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE TODAY— click any row to expand

The pattern was always in your data.
Nothing could read it. Until now.

04 · Why Epicbrief

Most tools store your data. Epicbrief models what it means — and keeps it alive.

Four architectural decisions sit under the layer. Two are table stakes — how data is stored, and when meaning is extracted. Two are the moat — which revenue concepts the model captures, and how they evolve as your business does. Get any one wrong and the whole thing falls apart.

The proof
Neo4j built their own GTM graph. Then they chose Epicbrief for the end-to-end intelligence layer.
— Why Neo4j is a customer
01 Cost

Ingestion, not agent runtime.

LLM work — extraction, semantic interpretation, relationship inference — happens once, at ingest. The graph is the cache. Agents read structured edges, not raw text.

Agents every rep can use — without ballooning API cost.

02 Accuracy

Graph DB, not SQL.

GTM is shaped like a network. Champion isn't a record — it's who's pushing for whom. Pain isn't a field — it's what's affecting which people. Forecast isn't a number — it's evidence chained across deals. Warehouses force this into rows.

Agents that reason about your pipeline — not just look up records.

03 Meaning

GTM ontology, not generic schema.

Ontology translates fragmented GTM data into real-world entities — Companies, Deals, People — and the meaning between them.

Agents that understand your business — not just integrate with your tools.

04 Change

Ontology manager, not static schema.

GTM evolves. New roles, categories, playbooks, product lines. Without a manager, every change is a re-architecture.

Agents that grow with your business — not ones you have to rebuild.

05 · Why ontology

Every concept that decides a deal — modeled as a live signal.

Companies, Deals, and People become one entity each, unified across every system. The relationships between them — Champion, Pain, Urgency — carry severity, history, and evidence. Together they form a living model of your revenue that updates as deals move and your business changes.

Layer
5 nodes · canonical only
click pills to add layers · click any node to inspect
works at stakeholder on party to fulfilled by belongs to on involves addressed by evaluates achieved by step of affects owned by part of member of has stage committed as on channel on deal part of competing for reason for attributed to based on attached to of feature fulfills Company Person Deal hub Contract Activity Pain Criterion Metric Process step Org unit Department Stage Forecast cat. Channel Thread Competitor Win/loss reason Feature Usage event
Canonical Deal Health Buying committee Forecasting Engagement Competitive Expansion
Start with the 5 canonical entities — Company, Person, Deal, Contract, Activity.

Click any layer pill above to add it. The canvas pulls back to fit the model as the graph grows.

Click any node for its properties, edges, and which domains share it.
Computed signals — functions over the data model

Not stored fields. Each one is a query over the existing data. Cross-domain signals are where the unified backbone earns its keep.

champion_strength(deal, person)Deal Health
Recency, frequency, response latency, sentiment trend, who initiated. Reads from activity sub-graph.
criteria_fulfilment(deal)Deal Health
Percent of must-have Criteria met. With product Capability modelled, identifies the specific gap blocking the deal.
buying_committee_coverage(deal)BC
Which stakeholder roles are filled vs missing. Also returns org_blast_radius — how many departments the deal touches.
org_influence(person)BC
PageRank-style score over REPORTS_TO and INFLUENCES edges. Surfaces the quiet decision-shaper your rep didn't know about.
decision_velocity(deal)Forecasting
Time per ProcessStep vs the historical average for similar deals. Flags stalls before they show up in stage data.
stage_dwell_drift(deal)Forecasting
Days in current Stage vs cohort median. Combined with decision_velocity, gives a sharper signal than CRM stage age alone.
forecast_confidence(deal)Cross-domain
A composite — criteria_fulfilment × buying_committee_coverage × decision_velocity × account_temperature. Independent of what the rep entered.
champion_at_risk(deal)Cross-domain
champion_strength dropping × org_influence not declining = the champion is fading on YOUR deal, not in their job. Action: re-engage. (Deal Health × BC × Engagement.)

06 · The architecture

The structural layer your GTM stack is missing.

Not another copilot, cockpit, or workflow wrapper — the one underneath all of them. Here's how the other three decisions compose around the ontology: meaning extracted once, on arrival; stored as relationships, not rows; kept current as your business changes.

Ontology Manager Defines meaning · data model · agent skills DECISION 04 · CHANGE Source systems CRM · Gong · email activity · usage EXTERNAL Ontology Raw data → meaning → GTM signals DECISION 03 Graph DB Connected facts Multi-hop traversal DECISION 02 Agents Autonomous + human-in-the-loop DECISION 01 Execution Salesforce · Slack rep deliverables EXTERNAL FEEDBACK · activity loops back as new source data

Click any component to inspect

Why composed

The 4 decisions compose.

Ingestion-time semantics needs the ontology. The ontology needs the graph. The graph needs agents to be useful. The agents need the manager to stay current. Decouple any of them and the whole chain leaks value.

Why the boundary

Sources and execution stay external.

Epicbrief doesn't replace your CRM, your call recorder, your email, or your Slack. It sits between them — turning raw events into a structured model agents reason from. Autonomous agents read the layer directly. Human-in-the-loop agents project from it — into existing tools when they fit, into a purpose-built view when they don't.

Why the feedback loop

Activity flows back as signal.

What happens in execution — meetings booked, emails sent, deals closed — flows back into the source layer, enriching the ontology over time. The graph compounds. The agents get smarter. The manager governs what they can mean.

The Ontology Manager

Where meaning stays governable — and yours.

Browse node types. Add new concepts (Renewal Risk, Expansion Signal, Pricing Trigger). Version semantic vocabularies. Watch which agents depend on which concept.

This is the difference between a vendor's idea of GTM and yours.

ontology · manager
Node types
  • Company
  • Person
  • Deal
  • → Pain
  • Metric
  • Criterion
  • ProcessStep
  • Activity
severityint · 1–5
scopeenum · org / team / individual
categorystring
urgencyenum · low / med / high / critical
↳ ROLLS_UP_TOPain
+ Add property or edge

07 · Get started

The mandate was never more agents.
It's the layer underneath them.

You've seen the layer. Here's how we build yours.